A7sii vs a7iii reddit. Sony A7III vs Sony A7II vs Sony A6300 / Sony A6400 .

A7sii vs a7iii reddit. 264 video recording. as someone who uses the a7iii and a7sii daily, Honestly just pick up another a7iii, every day i think about selling my a7sii because of the minimal difference it offers to the a7iii (with the exception to lowlight) the A7iii smokes my a7sii in almost all ways, especially with battery life and sharpness, colour science is also nicer but when shooting slog i'm grading pretty intensely anyway so You could easily get the job done, and save money with getting the a7iii, but if you're wanting to future-proof yourself then definitely go with the a7iv. This article on AstroBackyard is a good place to start on the differences and benefits of both setups. I’ve been through the A7 1-3, and the A7r 3&4, and the only reason I still have an R4 is because it has twice the shutter life. Really looking for answers from people who have played with both I'm curious why the a7sii is more expensive than the a7iii even though the a7iii… Hello! I was looking to buy Sony a7sii after reading reviews on how its a beast in low light performance and overall quality. If 24mp is enough for your needs than the improvements on the A7III will making shooting a lot more enjoyable. on a digital dispay each pixel counted has all 3 color channels. There is no way to alleviate the 4K rolling shutter on a6600. I also have an OG A7s (not the A7sii) and the A7iii is a far better camera in every way. It’s a way better video camera than A7III and A7III is way better photography camera due to better grip and better EVF. Stabilization usually doesn't matter for telephoto lenses since those tend to have it built in, e. Go with A7III. All comes down to what your needs are. The 8 bit codec isn't strong enough to handle grading. Source: A7III/A6500 owner, have A6300, A7sii, 7ii, 7rii & 7riii Right off the bat, Slog 2 SOOC imo is trash. A7iii is the clear winner in video. com Nov 12, 2020 · The a7S III comes five years after the Mark II. 175K subscribers in the Cameras community. My A7iii does me just fine. See full list on mirrorlesscomparison. If I remember correctly, the A7Rii didn't have compressed RAW. 24mp is more than enough for literally any work, especially with the up-sampling technology that is now standard in phot Will swapping my camera for e. $1600 A7iii vs new $3200 A7iv. I personally own a GH5 and been a GHx fanboy since GH2. Therefore, we highly recommend Sony a7iii camera. My a7iii also has some overheating issues and that, unfortunately, is just unacceptable in a professional environment. So what exactly has changed in that time? We took a closer look and found a more ambitious video tool that helps explain the higher pricing. Pocket 4k is gonna need to be rigged out and no autofucs. On the other hand if buying Sony A7III won't burn a hole in your pocket, than it's a worthy upgrade for 700ish dollars imo! A7C got flip screen, no magenta colour cast of A7III, better battery life, faster auto focus including Animal Eye AF, Gyro data post stabilization, UL recording, less bulk and weight. I would go with a7iii, 4k 24/30fps is sharper while low light is good in both, a7iii also has superior AF & big battery. Post reviews, articles, and videos of products, unboxings, etc. When I went G85 to a7iii, it was because I could get the Tamron 17-28, 28-75 and 70-180 f2. 3MP vs. The A7iii is only 8 bit, shoots 4K at up to 30 fps, and has 4:2:0 sampling. If you are new to video, my only real recommendation is to get an affordable zoom and an affordable 50mm prime. However, after excessive research I started noticing negative reviews on battery life, focus and tracking. 8 zoom lens, and possibly an 85mm prime. each pgoto site does not contain information from more than one color. Sony 70-350, and OSS in is better than IBIS. A7III is a great camera and you can take some killer astrophotography shots with one, but if you're buying a camera specifically for astro and shooting DSOs, you're better off with a dedicated astronomy camera. 4; on a weebill lab gimbal run and gun; light for travel a7iii lenses are 24/1. A lot of people are commenting about how the body is the main difference but they're forgetting the software side of things. 4 w/ the sii. I think the biggest reason to use a7iii over Ur phone will be the dynamic range you will get from slog. Haha I bought the A7SIII cage for a steal on pre-order, thinking it would fit my A7III The SIII is taller and bigger, so the A7III won't fit the smaller screw top right where otherwise the strap attachment would be. The Sony lineup gets the job done REALLY well, especially the latest a7r and a7iii. But, Sony A7II is better bang for buck if your only priority is solely Image Quality. I use gimbals a lot and don't wanna be bothered with manual focus only. For proffessional work, the A7sii is probably the best. 2 Megapixels, whereas the Okay, but the A7iii has better tech than the R2. 2 mp vs 12. Let shadows be shadows. All questions and photographic experience levels welcome! It's not just worse screen/evf/card slot, it's a stop more dynamic range, it's fully mechanical shutter (electronic only front curtain on the A7Cii), it's half the max shutter speed (1/8000 vs 1/4000), worse performing battery (600 vs 540 rated shots), the loss of cfexpress support (which can help clear your buffer faster). A7iii pros - lighter, smaller, better video auto focus, better EVF, sharper 4k, much better in lowlight FS5 Pros - built in varible ND filter, built in xlr, no record limit, 10 bit internal HD/1080 recording upto 240fps slow motion, 4K 120fps raw externally, no overheating, LCD screen can be moved around wherever, SDI out, and the Rotable grip is amazing. What are he pros and cons of the A7sii vs. Your gimbals performance will probably be better then one for the A7sII gives superb crisp image compare to A7III in term of low light I owned both. I know the batteries on the A7ii and A7sii are terrible compared to the A7iii and a7c, but I shoot with an AC to DC converter with a Jackery power station or I just use an extension cord if I'm at home. I am looking into getting more into astrophotography on the side but i also like to shoot portraits and a small amount of landscapes and such. Previous generation, so not really comparable, but the one thing that is perhaps somewhat comparable is the file size. Sony has been my main cam since release and I absolutely love it. I'm attracted to the A7Sii because my sister is a wedding photographer who uses an A7iv, and her spouse uses an A7iii so I can be in their ecosystem. 8. I filmed weddings and some other projects on the a7iii, a7r3, a7sii, a6500, and a6300 over the past few years. But yeah, the key way to answer this question is to make a list of all APS-C vs FF lenses you'd actually buy and decide based on that. A7iii has the better battery and IBIS are the same. Okay. Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. With A6600 you may as well get an A7iii then. Full frame sensor, comparable quality A7sii offers similar image quality to FS5/7 so there’s that XT4 has internal 10 bit up to 4k60p, and Sony's 8 bit files are horrible to work with. Don't get me wrong, the A9 is still a phenomenal photographer's camera but the A7III is a better all-rounder of that time period of cameras. AF is also improved on the A7iii. The A7iii doesn’t shoot 10 bit video, it’s a skip, the A7sii does but I’m not sure how much of an improvement it is over the A7si as I’ve never used either or looked into comparing them Reply reply More replies More replies More replies More replies Welcome to reddit's home for discussion of the Canon EF, EF-S, EF-M, and RF Mount interchangeable lens DSLR and Mirrorless cameras, and occasionally their point-and-shoot cousins. i’m looking to upgrade from my a6000 in the next few weeks but i’m having trouble deciding what camera to get. If you absolutely need, Eye Autofocus, Usb-C Charging, Better Higher ISO performance and a Stellar Battery Life go for Sony A7III. You have to nail exposure every time, and (especially when it comes to the A7sii/7ii/6300 era) colors tend to break or come out ugly when grading in post. A7III VS A7SII VS A7RII Welcome to reddit's home for discussion of the Canon EF, EF-S, EF-M, and RF Mount interchangeable lens DSLR and Mirrorless cameras, and Would second the A7c for video. . I wish the difference was only $500 in Canada, but I am looking at camera store second hand stock. My last full frame camera was the a7ii and my current is the a6600 which I sidegraded to for video features. Bottom line, you can survive with the a7iii but plan to upgrade as soon as you can afford it. And my sister keeps telling me I'll regret not going full frame for that bokeh. Sep 29, 2022 · We have compared the main features of the sony a7sii and the sony a7iii, we found some professional features in Sony a7iii. I was also considering a used PXW-FS5II, since its closer to a cinema camera (vs the A7SII), has built in ND filters, XLR audio, SDI out, 4k 120, and more. I'd also suggest getting the Sigma 24-70 f2. Due to financial constraints I’m going to be have to choose to purchase one out of these two. The 26mp Fujis (X-T3, X-T4, X-S10) have of course much faster readout than the a6600/a7III. I recently had a friend consider the a7Sii and I talked him it the a7iii and he loves it. I haven't owned the s5ii enough to use it on a daily basis so maybe I need to use it more but a7sii is my go to cam as I know it inside out. a sony or sigma art 24-70 will fix this problem even on my a7sII? Is this a characteristic of contrast detection AF? For anyone that has the same combo, do you notice the same behaviour? Even with higher end lenses and AF-C on a7sii? I'm trying to decide between the Sony A7iii and the Sony A7ii. 24. A7III has way better AF for video work. Admittedly it’s getting a bit old, it’s probably superior to the EOS-R in almost every category. 4 gm for creamy depth of field The A7III will be your best bet for sure. If lenses aren’t a factor though, I’d probably get the S5ii over the a7iii. I can only speak from my experience. If i was buying a new body, I would only consider getting A7III for the price (1800), and maybe get a GM lens to go with it. 4 gm, 35/1. the A7iii for video? I know the A7iii has much better autofocus and face recognition plus 24. This is a subreddit to discuss new cameras… A7sii wins in almost every way except for colours. australian dollars that is Reply seanprefect • Sport videographer and documentary DP here. The codec brings this down though. AF in the A7c is uncanny and feels like cheating at times, although the A7iii's no slouch either. Therefore, with a focal reducer/speed booster I would expect about a 1 stop increase in light gathering with the a7iii in crop mode for the same field of view as the a7s with the same lens without reducer Sony A7III vs Sony A7II vs Sony A6300 / Sony A6400 Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony . Both are amazing choices no matter whicj one you get. A7C has a flip-out screen. g. The A7III is pretty much a A7RIII with less megapixels and and lower res EVF. A7III has almost the same low light performance as the A7SII, only if you go crazy high, like over 20k ISO, you notice a difference. A7III does have noticeably better rolling shutter performance than the a6600. Price difference is 900 USD. The dynamic range of the A7Sii is good, but I would take robust colour over dynamic range ANY DAY. 85mm has always been my favorite focal length and I think you could definitely use it alongside a 24-70 zoom. I would still keep the a7iii because in controlled light, it will look the same and you have superior battery life and auto focus. I'm eyeing an a7sii + Zeiss on eBay but a new iphone 14 pro is cheaper and can do 4k60+ Dolby vision. Feb 27, 2018 · Although the resolution remains roughly the same (24. We also sometime talk about other canon equipment such as printers. to get all 3 color channels you need 4 photosites or a 2x2 grid (1 red 1 blue and 2 green) to get equivalent to 1 digital I know the batteries on the A7ii and A7sii are terrible compared to the A7iii and a7c, but I shoot with an AC to DC converter with a Jackery power station or I just use an extension cord if I'm at home. I picked up a used A7RII a few month ago and just sold it and bought a A7RIII a couple weeks ago. The sensitivity of the a7iii is similar to that of a7s or a7sii in full frame shooting based on dxomark and other resources I’ve found. The A7R3 is a great camera. 8 zoom lenses for about $1400 less than I could get a Sony 24-70 and 70-200 f2. Winner is obvious. If you're just starting out with basic paid projects and on a tight budget, like simple music videos and event videos, yeah I'd roll with the A7iii for now, especially if you plan to snap some photos as well. EVF bigger on the A7iii, but the flippy screen in the A7c is more useful. In fact you'd be better off training your sights on a used A7III since it's got XAVC S, something the A9 lacks. Yes, the A7Sii is good in low-light, but if you're not trying to turn night to day, the XT4 is fine. Some thoughts: Identical sensor. I’ve decided in the A7iv since I want the best I can have for the next 10 years. I'm not interested in video, so to me it comes to whether having a better auto focus, dual memory card slots, supposedly superior lowlight performance, and carrying half as many batteries is worth being able to put more money towards glass. The difference between them is really not that big. Differences aside, the A7iii provides amazing quality at a great price, and is still sufficient for most professional shoots. You'll save money getting the a7iii and use the money you save for glass. Customers clearly know what suits them more. Both are 8-bit only, and you might also want to check out the Z6, S5, and Z6ii in a similar price range for higher image quality (at the expense of battery life and/or AF). There are some test samples by Tony northup comparing the A7sii to the A7rii Full frame and APS-C mode. 18 vs iphone 14 pro Not a troll question. To some extent I even prefer the noise of the A7IV (I use it as b-cam and SIII as A-cam). The A7SII's only two disadvantages are Megapixels and the lack of H. 8 and 85/1. Sony doesn't shoot RAW and I'd get the A7iii over the a7sii anyway. Better autofocus and easier to rig up with a cage (in my opinion). Phase detection vs contrast detection. Looking to purchase my own camera (and gear) and am confused between the Blackmagic Pocket Cinema 4K and the Sony A7iii. The low light performance sounds nice for the uncontrolled lighting situation of sailing. Tons of lenses around. I’d really only see myself using the camera for narrative shorts and filmmaking in general not so much photography, but it would be a plus to have it as well. Each snap with jpg and RAW was about 80-100mb, vs about 40mb on my A7iii now with compressed RAW. Only when it's necessary. The low light difference isn’t that big unless you get to places where you’ll need 100k iso. Bigger lenses feel a lot more at home on the iii. I've also watched a lot of extreme low light comparisons and the A7iii *I think* uses a noise reduction algorithm at high ISOs. In most ways its better than by a7sii and my now gone a7iii but it's different and it's not as quick to setup those high or low shots. I’ve been using my agency’s Sony A7sii and a rented Sony FS7 until now. All questions and photographic experience levels welcome! The A7C has some good video features like gyro stabilization, but the A7III offers a more robust body. The FX3 is much more geared for video use and the camera firmware and software features are case in point. The latter allows for more light collection and Sony claims 15 stops of dynamic range at low sensitivities, which is more than a 1-stop improvement over the A7 II if we measure As for the MP, 42 vs 33, i would give up 9 megapixels for an overall better body, new menu system, autofocus, etc. on a camera the sensor has a checkerboard pattern of blue, red, and green photowites. BMPCC 4K vs SONY A7iii/sii Hey guys, I’ve been trying to upgrade to a better filmmaking camera (I currently own a canon rebel t6). For about $1700 it seems like a pretty good deal IMO, was wondering if anyone else rocks an FS5 II and had some insight on it. Why We Recommend Sony a7iii? Sony a7iii comes with a 35mm full-frame Exmor R CMOS sensor with 24. A7sii +Zeiss 55 f. It has a better battery, much better AF, updated controls and two card slots. It's a more versatile camera; I love mine. Well said! I have both a6400 and a7iii (not a7ii) for the past 3 years - mainly for video - they each have its usage for me My set up for a6400, Sony native lenses with OSS 10-18 (stays on 90% of the time, photo journalistic look) and 18-105, also Sigma 16/1. The footage of the a7Sii won't look any better, the reason it appears so is most likely people are using better lenses. 2MP), the A7 III features a newly developed Exmor R CMOS sensor with BSI (Back-Illuminated) technology. The main benefit of A7sIII is the 12800 secondary base ISO, which, just keeping it real - if you have the ISO that high the lighting will most often be shit anyway. i think i have narrowed it down to the a7III, a7sII or the a7rII. Just glancing at amazon used right now, looks like A7iii is at a huge pricing advantage vs a7iv or a7siii. I don’t care for the way the Sony fits in the hand, I don’t care for their menu system, and I A7sii, being full frame and having a much more expensive sensor is definitely going to offer the best image, colors and tones. But the sii is better in low light and made for video. I’m not a fan of Sony cameras for a variety of reasons, but I do know quite a bit about them. Dynamic range makes a huge difference when it comes to quality. unfortunately in Australia the a7iii is $3000 :(, The a6500 sits at around $1300 and the a7sii is around $2700-$3000. More buttons on the A7iii, although IMHO one doesn't need them as much on the A7c. As someone else said though, if a7iv is an option, it’d be a much harder choice. It's also been proven that the A7rii super 35 mode does do better with noise. The a7sii is very noticeable when it comes to having better quality video in low light. Welcome to reddit's home for discussion of the Canon EF, EF-S, EF-M, and RF Mount interchangeable lens DSLR and Mirrorless cameras, and occasionally their point-and-shoot cousins. The ISO sensitivity of the A7iii and A7sii is nearly identical until you get to the very highest values, so the A7iii is actually quite good in low light. Here are some reasons why your a7iii will perform better. an a7III really fix this, or is my lens defective? Or do you think that buying e. You will have better image stabilisation on the a7iii. I own an A7iii and used to own an A7Rii. enxfvd xybdmn diapj gatop tvzio uptgr jedvvne ivqgnl hgwsxem xowqk